In many places, new homes are needed, but the only space available for building them in the country sides. Some people believe it is more important to protect the country side and not build new homes there. What is your opinion about this?
These days the population is growing up in many areas. Therefore, the demand of build new homes is increasing as well. As a result of lack of spaces, some people are compelled to live in country sides. However, people believe that the suburbs should be preserved.
On the one hand, building new homes in county sides have numerous benefits. Firstly, the population rate become balanced. If a sizable number of people live in cities and they cannot benefit from country sides’ condition, big cities will face several problems. Consequently, building homes in the suburbs provide people with best solution. For instance, residents always claim that they suffer from heavy traffic in rush hours. Thus, by building new homes in country sides might reduce the traffic. Secondly, building homes in the suburbs can facilitate people’s commuting. Since most people have been working in factories where is located in country sides, they are more likely to want to live in country sides because they can save their time and budget t. thirdly, the property prices is inflated in big cities. Therefore, most people would rather to purchase home in country sides because the price is affordable.
On the other hand, building new homes in country sides have a lot of disadvantages. From an environmental point of view, building new homes in country sides can cause irreparable damage to the environment. Builders prefer to take full advantage of huge spaces, they cut down trees and build a wide range of apartments. From another perspective, building new homes in the suburbs leads to increasing air pollution. Since the weather in big cities is polluted, dirty air cannot exit from cities id country sides are full of buildings.
In conclusion, from my point of view country sides should be protected and if we need to build new homes, we can catch up on spaces by renovating old houses.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 320, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the best'.
Suggestion: with the best
...ing homes in the suburbs provide people with best solution. For instance, residents alway...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1572.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02236421725 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60927125879 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5303514377 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.5348772335 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.6 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.65 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.453387840911 0.244688304435 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147976859731 0.084324248473 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10458701734 0.0667982634062 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.280274171552 0.151304729494 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0535900365242 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.