In many professional sports, there is an increase in the number of athletes using banned substances to improve their performance. What are the causes of the
phenomenon and what are some of the possible solutions?
Undoubtedly, the exceptionally talented sportsperson in distinct terrains are inclining towards the usage of illegal drugs just to enhance their stamina which is typically an unethical behaviour. This essay asserts that root cause behind the phenomenon is the greed for victory which could be tackled through the moral support and stringent legislations.
Even though every player exhibit his best to bring the glory, history has been witnessed that world recognises the winner only. Therefore, in order to earn name and fame sportsmen are indulging theirselevs irrationally in the drug trap without considering the untoward circumstances of such indesireable acts. Moreover, lack of sportemenship supports the consumption of offensive substances which do not allow individual to reliease the gulity they are commiting. To exemplify, recently one of the famous American boxer died due to the high intoxication level in the body during a match.
Since, the winning and loss are the fundamental rules of any sports thus instilling such kind of attitude among athelets is an impeccable measure to curb the menace. Seemingly, acquainting them with the cruciality of interpersonal relationships with other players and also imparting knowledge regarding social behaviour are conductive in maintaining the delegacy of sports environment. Furthermore, effective supervision and harsh punishmens can lead to the rightouspath. It would be biased to overlook the data published by Tribune stating that International sports fedrations have passed law of lifetime ban in case breach of code of conduct during games.
To conclude, widespread implementation of strict rules can create conducive atmosphere and can keep alive the essence of sports.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, look, moreover, regarding, so, still, therefore, thus, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1488.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.72307692308 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15426826444 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.719230769231 0.561755894193 128% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6856199449 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.272727273 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6363636364 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.72727272727 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.079784636409 0.244688304435 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0231454263322 0.084324248473 27% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0228890327492 0.0667982634062 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.037738903321 0.151304729494 25% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0313384651463 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.61 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.