Some would argue that mobile phones are not useful for teenagers, while others would say that they can provide some benefits. While parents can communicate with their children easily who are mobile phone users, I believe that these devices are rather addictive which prevent teenage people from socializing and hinders mental growth.
The main advantage to provide smartphones to the young generation is that parent can track the location of their loving child. Children of the age group 13 to 19 lead a risky period of their lives as they may ruin their lives by following wrong paths. The parents must guide their children to follow the right path. Hence, to know the whereabouts of their children via a simple message or phone call will work and it will ultimately helpful for the betterment of children. For instance, a recent article published in the daily New Age, where a father summarized the benefit of providing gadgets to his children where he specifically mentioned the ease of communication. Despite this, I believe that handheld electronic devices are very addictive and time-consuming which hinders the mental and social growth of young people.
Teenagers, nowadays, are strongly attracted to gadgets on which they spend quite a lot of time playing online games and using different social media platforms in their closed room rather than meeting people outside socializing. Less socialization leads to lacking in the mental growth of teens as they too much time scrolling iPhone screens. For example, a recent survey on the age group between 13-19 on mental health assessment conducted by a group of therapist suggested that those who do not have access to mobile phone better mental health than other groups. This is why I believe, teenage people should have limited access to iPhone/iPad/Android tablets.
In conclusion, although parents can know the whereabouts of their young lads, if they carry mobile phones, they also should be aware of the fact that smartphones are addictive and it hinders the mental growth of young generation. So, it is suggested that parents should restrict teenage people's access to mobile equipment.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, may, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1809.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 348.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19827586207 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68687073428 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548850574713 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.226556591 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.214285714 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8571428571 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.21428571429 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111554292285 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0450730709518 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0387296361406 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.067971244615 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0214969871135 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.