Many things that used to be done in the home by hands are now being done by machines. Does this development bring more advantages or disadvantages?
Advanced technology, as one of the keys to make our life easy, is a heated-up issue. It is believed that many gadgets at home have replaced the humans work at homes. I partially agree with that its beneficial outcomes, but the drawbacks can be measured. This essay will firstly, discuss some positive aspects of that current development in machines, and secondly, mention the main disadvantage, followed by a reasoned conclusion.
To commence with, several home activities attracted the producers to come with ideas how to ease its work to humans, and it resulted into electric devices at homes. When these are distributed into market and tried at homes, people figured out that they can save their time and effort, rather than doing the same activities manually. For Instance, kitchen machines, such as dishwasher and washing machine, are being widely used all over the world and become essential devices for family during house setup.
On the contrary, some activities are extremely special while getting arranged at home; therefore, it is preferable to make it by hands. It also needs some certain skills to ensure its level of quality. Several machines able to cook many kinds of food, but the taste cannot be assured and maintained like human made. For example, machine does not have this human sense in regard to food ingredients while arrangement. A survey by a prestigious university in United Kingdom has published that 90 % of most delicious food is home made without any interference of machines.
To sum up, it is undeniable that introducing machines in homes has beneficial outcomes on human life, but the drawbacks cannot be neglected. Balance utilizing of machines is mandatory at home.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, such as, in regard to, on the contrary, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1435.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14336917563 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72797067059 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652329749104 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1801046673 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.5 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9285714286 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16106293763 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0517461352246 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0345583031685 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0984397722227 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0200116937708 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.