Many working people get little or no experience or no exercise either during the working day or in their free time, and have health problems as a result.
Why do many working people not get enough exercise?
What can be done about this problem?
Exercise and fitness are interwined. Despite the significance physical activity possesses, the common working crowd is blissfully ignorant of these benefits and face troubles due to bad health. This essay discusses the causes of the ill effect, and suggests solutions to mitigate the issue.
To begin with, the most important problem can be attributed to human lifestyle. This is because people are working so hard to accomplish their personal and professional committments that they hardly get anytime to relax or excercise. For instance, many service-based companies pressurize their employee to meet estimated project deadline. As a consequence, professionals end up stretching more time in workplace. Furthermore, people prefer to stay back at home to destress and to relax down after hectic schedule, which becomes another reason why mankind inherits a habit of being couch-potato. Additionally, lack of innate sense to realise advantages of exercise keeps them away from being productive.
There are few measures to counter the phenomenon. Firstly, workforce in a firm should dedicate an hour daily towards their health. In other words, companies should encourage its staff to be fit by having a gym inside their premise, so that employees could be benefitted with these facilities. Secondly, the government can organise workshops highlighting contribution of strength training on healthy body and mind. Lastly, arranging frequent marathons or cycling rally may motivate individuals to participate in it.
In conclusion, although extented working hours and lesser active life at home are the main causes of risking health, these problems are not insurmountable. In my view, organisation and society should collectively work to tackle these issues, and they should begin by considering some of the solutions proposed above.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 272, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...s, and they should begin by considering some of the solutions proposed above.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, lastly, may, second, secondly, so, for instance, in conclusion, in my view, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1471.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55094339623 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01207726819 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.716981132075 0.561755894193 128% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.1471830126 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.9375 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5625 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.9375 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166453702309 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0423240163904 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0369230107473 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0879126412505 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0198120597031 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.61 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.91 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.