Over a last decade or so, we have seen a revolution in technology and that lead to evolution in modern communication. Back in time, people used to write letters to communicate with each other and to exchange the news. In a modern era of telephone and internet, writing personal mails is no longer necessary.
There are many reasons why people are tending to use modern technology to communicate. First, 20th century is a materialistic life and having a conversation in a phone or texting a person is easier than writing a letter. This would be the main reason why the current generation is using modern technology to communicate. Second, using modern communication methods can help the environment. In this way, we could use less paper, which means more trees. Environmental social activists are taking extra measures to bring the awareness about the cutting trees. Third, emerging of IT technologies and jobs in IT sector makes us feel like, writing an email is more professional than writing a personal mail. A well-written email can help to get a good job in the competitive world.
However, there are certain times where writing a personal letter is an important. It might bring the extra joy and can add a bit of emotional touch in the family. Motivational mails can be stored for longer duration and can be viewed later whenever we are down in the dumps.
In my opinion, yes, I completely agree that with the help of modern communication methods, writing a letter is no longer necessary. However, there could be certain times, writing a letter is more important than texting a person.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 69, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[1]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...imes where writing a personal letter is an important. It might bring the extra joy and can a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, third, well, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1325.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88929889299 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89844823397 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546125461255 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.362630417 49.4020404114 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 82.8125 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9375 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.625 7.06120827912 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144964999622 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0523003342295 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475946354177 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0996720944493 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0383124321512 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.0946893788 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.