Modern communications mean that it’s no longer necessary to write letters.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Connecting people using advanced technology are becoming more and more pervasive in modern world. It has numerous advantages compared to the old handwriting. I totally agree with the idea that it will soon replace the traditional means of communication.
Firstly, internet breakthroughs facilitate us in every aspect of daily lives, either work or personal. Employees of a multi-national company can immediately contact their colleagues through making phone calls or writing e-mails. Otherwise, they need to spend huge amount of time exchanging information among others. Time is minimized to the lowest level, enables a more effective working productivity. With regards to daily life, reaching our beloved ones has never been easier. Viber, a free application, is designed to support everyone to text or ring anyone by just a click. Therefore, I can make calls to my sister in Toronto anytime at no extra cost.
Secondly, modern technology advances by how all the data is stored and tracked. We can save and look up everything we want as long as we connect to the online network. Google drive is an absolutely incredible tool to support Gmail users to archive and back up their personal information like photos, email… I can easily find my pictures taken 5 years ago which were automatically stored in an application called Google photo, although I already deleted them in my mobile phone.
To sum up, letters in paper have existed for thousands of years but given recent development, modern communication using the internet dominates as an effective tool of connecting people, ideas.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 195, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ctive tool of connecting people, ideas.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1341.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25882352941 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96023628222 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.705882352941 0.561755894193 126% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.0134420386 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.7857142857 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2142857143 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.21428571429 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0765847954604 0.244688304435 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0250492043022 0.084324248473 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0332396315136 0.0667982634062 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.04950322423 0.151304729494 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0301928260306 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.