In modern world, many children spend a lot of time in front of computers,television and smartphones. This is very harmful to them. To what extent do you agree.
In recent times, an increasing number of children are spending lengthy hours in front of electronic gadgets, which could cause harm to their well-being. In my opinion,I completely agree that longer hours in front of screens causes detrimental effects on children it affects their visual as well as cognitive skills.
To begin with, children's cognitive skills are totally impacted by their spending longer hours in front of electronic devices. In other words, their ability to reason and think properly can be damaged by radiation emitting from the screen. This light ray could harm a certain part of the brain cells, which could result to a weak brain function. For example, a survey carried out on some reasonable number of teenagers in year 2017, shows that those who spend hours watching digital screens tend to perform poorly in school. It is therefore evident that cognitive skills is greatly affected dues to extensive starring of electronic system.
Additionally, excessive time look at computers or other digital screen appliances can cause visual impairment in children. That is to say, children who focus on screen device could develop sight problem when they get older. The eye problems are mainly due to decline in eye motor neuron hence these teenagers tend to have difficulties in focusing on longer or shorter distance object. A clear example was recently noticed by some group of opticians working at university of Benin teaching hospital, their medical analysis of frequent eye problems in children was attributed to regular screen viewing. It is undoubtful that increase starring at electronic device causes harm to the eyes.
In conclusion, longer hours in front of screen appliances causes harm to children's visual ability and cognitive skills. It is therefore recommended that parents should monitor and control the hours their wards spend starring at electronic gadgets.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 167, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , I
... harm to their well-being. In my opinion,I completely agree that longer hours in f...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, look, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion, in other words, to begin with, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1601.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31893687708 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62530374103 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558139534884 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.8716063139 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.357142857 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2142857143 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113261365419 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.045718843894 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.037247958523 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0823621935739 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0196837208468 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.