Some teachers are responsible for social and intellectual development of students than parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is a general believe that the responsibility of developing the young adults, socially and intellectually, rests more on the teachers than parents. Though everyone has a part to play in bringing out the best from the young kids; I therefore disagree and state that parents have a greater role the teachers to instilling discipline and maturity in the social lives of their wards.
Firstly, it is important to state that the home is the first school of a child. When a man becomes a father, he attains not just a change in status but an added responsibility to be accountable to his new born offspring. As the child grows in the home, he is vested with the task of providing a conducive atmosphere for nurturing his child. For example, the father at home, likewise the mother, monitors the peers and playmate of his child. He makes sure that right choices are made at this level; because he knows that peer-pressure has a lot of influence on them at that tender age. Consequently, due to the bond of attachment of parents to their children, from birth, they easily yield to the advice and chastening from their guardians.
Secondly, the grooming of young ones, even as they choose their career path and make progress intellectually is greatly attributed to their parents choices. For example, a child that is brought up by a father who is a Medical Doctor; and also, having an academician as a Mother will have a strict and developed background. Children learn easily from role models; and more so, examples from their parents. Therefore a child fostered in this type of home, most likely, will want to toll the path of his studious father and research - inclined mother. Overtime this physical and practical demonstration, albeit intellectually - prone, will guide and lead a cause for the offspring to form an early career decision. Thus, a decision that would have been, directly or indirectly, influenced by the parents.
In conclusion, the contribution to the development and growth of young adults to level up socially and in their intellect has been partly played by caregivers be it in school or at home. However, more accountability to this task lies more on fathers and mothers as they are the first point of call, point of contact and reference to these young ones; also, are more influential to the wholesome well being and life choices they end up with.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 406, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...d more so, examples from their parents. Therefore a child fostered in this type of home,...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 448, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...erefore a child fostered in this type of home, most likely, will want to toll the...
^^
Line 7, column 159, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ect has been partly played by caregivers be it in school or at home. However, mor...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, likewise, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, well, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1969.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 406.0 315.596192385 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84975369458 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48881294772 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83020957968 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529556650246 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 602.1 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.4874572256 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.0625 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.375 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.875 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126325936239 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0461694289106 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0620514881993 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0897821943128 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0723253371511 0.056905535591 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.