More and more companies allow their employees to work from home or “remotely” rather than going into an office each day.
Do the advantages of this policy outweigh the disadvantages?
In recent years the culture of working remotely has risen in popularity over the alternative to exclusively working form the office. This essay will explain why I believe this trend has more benefits than drawbacks.
Looking firstly at the advantages that result from this change, the imperative one is that this is more cost-efficient for the employers. This is because companies practice the concept of open floors rather than the named offices. As a result of this, they usually save a handsome amount of financial resources by sharing the infrastructure. To explain, the same office can be utilized by a number of employees. Conversely, in case of working from the office companies has to invest more on the infrastructure including building and maintaining the designated offices for the pan company. Furthermore, another advantage of this way of working is that it is more time-efficient. This is because employees save their travelling time and can invest in some other useful activities. Thus help in reducing the work-related anxieties. In contrast, every day travelling to and fro from the office usually consequent in additional unwanted stress level because of the traffic congestion.
Nevertheless, there are some drawbacks that result from this style of working, the important one is that it might act as a deterrent for employees' health. To explain houses are not equipped with the proper infrastructure required by some professionals. For instance, if a person who works for long hours in front of the computer did not have proper sitting arrangement then the injuries in the spinal cord are often the consequence. On the other side offices usually take care of these requirements while designing the workspaces.
In conclusion, I think the advantages of time and cost-efficiency that comes with remote working outweigh the disadvantages of minor health issues which can be mitigated with proper cautiousness.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, firstly, furthermore, if, look, nevertheless, so, then, thus, while, as to, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1645.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37581699346 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12708215909 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56862745098 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2101606858 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.8125 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.125 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.625 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310133747784 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0919723153778 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0621781867273 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163419000023 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0883648949315 0.056905535591 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.