More and more people have to compete with young people for the same jobs.
What problems does this cause? what are the possible solutions?
It is argued that these days many people are in competition with the youngster for the same post in a department. The main problem associated with this cause is increased unemployment among adolescent and the most viable solution is early retirement for aged people.
The principal problem associated with this is it leaves many youngsters jobless. Many old people are experienced enough to get appointed for any post because the employers prefer to appoint a person with enormous experience and not inducting a naïve with no experience who has to start from scratch. The result of this often leads to the staggering number of youngsters deprived of a blue-collar job. For example, a survey conducted on job advertisements by the California University scholars found that 70% of the posts require 5-10 years’ experience for a well-paid job due to which about half of the young people stay jobless.
To tackle this problem the government should cut the retirement age for the employees and offer them old-age benefits such as medical and monthly stipend. In other words, this plan could ensure old aged about their future security and they can spend their rest of the life with contentment, thus they do not have to rush for the job to make both ends meet. As a result, this will leave enough room for the young people in the job market and eventually it will reduce unemployment among youth. For example, a similar initiative in Japan resulted in a 52% decrease in competition among more and less experienced persons.
To conclude, many people strive with the youngsters to secure the same place in the job market which raises the evil of joblessness in adolescents in the society; however, it can be addressed through the government reforms on retirement plan about the old staff.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, thus, well, as to, for example, such as, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1499.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99666666667 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75696088716 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546666666667 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.4367560905 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.272727273 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2727272727 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.72727272727 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259901016959 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102493866706 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0399451350256 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163713790849 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0569053102783 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 50.2224549098 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.