Scientists predict that all people will choose to talk the same global language in the future.
Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
Researchers believed that in the future, communication language would be the same for everyone. I believe it has both positive and negative aspects depending upon the situation, which will be highlighted in the upcoming paragraphs.
On the one hand, Lingua franca begets several benefits. Firstly, businesses from all over the world will flourish due to the ease of communication. As it becomes easier for entrepreneurs to market their products to people living around the world. For illustration, if people can understand the details of the product then it would increase the sales of the product and organizations can easily get the benefit of generating revenue. Secondly, traveling would be much more comfortable than ever before. Tourists will not hesitate to travel to any part of the world due to the language barrier. Thus, these benefits make it a positive development.
On the other hand, there are multiple negative effects of a global language. First of all, if people prefer to adopt the same language then it would result in cultural death. As a language is a medium through which cultural identities are prevented. For example, children will not be able to enjoy their ancestor’s language because folk culture and literature are associated with language. Furthermore, many people will face unemployment due to the establishment of a single language. People are employed as translators and interpreters in multiple places such as tourist spots and embassies, they will become jobless.
To sum up, I believe that a universal language is beneficial in terms of business and tourism. However, it will also result in cultural loss and create unemployment for the masses.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 176, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...then it would result in cultural death. As a language is a medium through which cu...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, thus, as to, for example, such as, first of all, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1425.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29739776952 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99057173448 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579925650558 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.7741564151 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.8235294118 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8235294118 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199743715916 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0623717866737 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.038539774677 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116272338575 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0484295889735 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.