In most countries, weddings are bigger and more expensive nowadays than in the past.
Why is this the case?
Is it a positive or a negative development?
It has been seen that marriage celebrations are becoming massive and costly event in many countries as compared to the older times. In this essay, I will delve deeper into this topic by discussing different causes and their both positive and negative outcomes on our societies, while expressing my support for the latter.
To begin with, a good reason for believing that wedding ceremonies cost more as opposed to the past is because of improvement in overall population’s purchasing power. This implies that the general populace would probably possess more money than in the past time whereby they could be able to afford expensive celebration by booking luxurious ballrooms and buying pricey wedding outfits. Consequently, this will create a sense of competition between people that they may receive more respect by organizing an enormous occasion thereby producing negative advancement in the society.
On the contrary, having improved transportation infrastructure is one of the reasons why wedding gala is becoming a bigger event. This means that many friends and relatives not only could use different advanced means for transportation such as airplanes, trains or boats, but they might also not spend a fortune to purchase travel tickets to reach the venue, unlike older times. As a result, this will provide the guests another platform to socialize and exchange cultures with different communities, which provides positive outcomes in the long run.
In conclusion, although people may vary in their opinions, I personally believe that expensive weddings produce negative outcomes in the society because this promotes competition amongst communities. If people do not understand this, then we might the population giving more respect to money then its people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 78, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...eving that wedding ceremonies cost more as opposed to the past is because of impro...
^^
Line 3, column 259, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
...probably possess more money than in the past time whereby they could be able to afford ex...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, may, so, then, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1506.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47636363636 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89168428715 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647272727273 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.1325904849 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.6 106.682146367 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8 7.06120827912 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246828542331 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0885265753422 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498823713861 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137085427804 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0474065493149 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.8 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.