In recent years, many small local shops have closed because of customers travel to large shopping centres or malls to do their shopping.
Is this a positive or a negative development?
It has been seen that consumers are preferring shopping complexes lately due to which many small indigenous businesses have closed . Some people believe that this is a positive development, whereas others hold the opposite perspective. In this essay, I will delve deeper into this topic by discussing both the positive and the negative sides, while expressing my support for the latter.
To begin with, a good reason for believing that closure of small shops is a negative advancement is because this can increase overall country’s poverty. This implies that the owners of small businesses could strive to earn money and they might unable to feed themselves and their families ; therefore, this would encourage the individuals to do unlawful activities to earn their living. Consequently, the crime rate may soar as a huge segment of the society can becomes unemployed .
On the other hand, having the convenience for purchasing is one of the reasons why convenient shops are not preferred by customers. This means that malls could offer a wider range of products and services under one roof so that the public might buy different commodities without going to different shops; as a result, people would buy groceries quickly. However, the earnings for small business owners will still be at risk as enormous shopping centres can attract the customers thereby forcing local shops to close.
In conclusion, although people may vary in their opinions, I personally believe that closing tiny retailers influences communities negatively because this can soar nation’s poverty rate causing different problems in the society. If the general populace do not understand this and continue to shop from malls, then we might see hunger and homeless prevailing the country.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 33, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
It has been seen that consumers are preferring shopping complexes lately due to which ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 131, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... small indigenous businesses have closed . Some people believe that this is a posi...
^^
Line 1, column 336, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ssing both the positive and the negative sides, while expressing my support for t...
^^
Line 2, column 467, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'become'
Suggestion: become
...ar as a huge segment of the society can becomes unemployed . On the other hand, having...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 485, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...nt of the society can becomes unemployed . On the other hand, having the convenie...
^^
Line 3, column 324, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to different shops; as a result, people would buy groceries quickly. However, th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, may, so, still, then, therefore, whereas, while, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1493.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33214285714 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80376167835 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.8759572905 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.727272727 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4545454545 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.3636363636 7.06120827912 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328270911174 0.244688304435 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111667943092 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0638982884502 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188348907824 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0192017010573 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.