Some people think that one of the best ways to solve environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It has been observed that the most recommended approach to counter environmental issues is to surge oil prices for private transportation commodities. Some people agree with this idea, whereas others express their disagreement for the aforementioned viewpoint. In this essay, I will delve deeper into topic by discussing both the concurrent and contradictory perspectives, while advocating for the former.
To begin with, a good reason for believing that petrolum products should become expensive is because this will discourage people to use their vehicles. This implies that the general populace is likely to use public transportation in order to transfer from one place to another as the fuel could be unaffordable by them; therefore, this would reduce the traffic on road, and hence, slash the levels of pollution in the atmosphere. Consequently, the effects of bigger environmental problems, such as global warming and rising sea levels can be mitigated.
On the other hand, adopting other methods like afforestation is the reason people disagree that increasing fuel prices is the bests option to preserve environment. This means that the public should plant more tress and reduce deforestation practices so that the health levels of oxygen and limited carbon dioxide could be maintained in the air; as a result, the citizen would breathe fresh air and remain healthy. Nevertheless, the human activities causing extreme carbon emissions must decreased so that the environmental damages can recover swiftly.
In conclusion, although people may vary in their opinions, I personally concur that increasing fuel prices is one of the effective steps to solve environmental problems. This is because not only will this improves the air quality, but also encourage the people to use public transportation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 100, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...counter environmental issues is to surge oil prices for private transportation co...
^^
Line 1, column 302, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... In this essay, I will delve deeper into topic by discussing both the concurrent ...
^^
Line 2, column 57, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... good reason for believing that petrolum products should become expensive is beca...
^^
Line 2, column 137, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cause this will discourage people to use their vehicles. This implies that the ge...
^^
Line 2, column 316, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...her as the fuel could be unaffordable by them; therefore, this would reduce the t...
^^
Line 2, column 542, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...global warming and rising sea levels can be mitigated. On the other hand, adopt...
^^
Line 3, column 370, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ned in the air; as a result, the citizen would breathe fresh air and remain healt...
^^
Line 3, column 532, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...reased so that the environmental damages can recover swiftly. In conclusion, al...
^^
Line 4, column 214, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s is because not only will this improves the air quality, but also encourage the ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, whereas, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1531.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48745519713 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06750572069 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609318996416 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.7207555279 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.181818182 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3636363636 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.0909090909 7.06120827912 200% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.01903807615 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198620935443 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.079060232436 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0754668899063 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120598415948 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0238996131548 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.