Most employers do job interviews before offering a position to a person. Do you think this is the best way to do it, or are there better alternatives? What is the best method of choosing employees in your opinion?
In this era, when population is growing at its highest space, competition cannot be overlooked. Enthusiasts and human resource teams are under a dilemma of reconstructing the entire recruitment process.
finding in hiring, right candidate, can be a long and tedious job. interviews can help expedite the entire process. it is a must for any conglomerate, company, office or any work place to find the right candidature. To exemplify, for an instance let’s assume that there are two posts available in the sales team, with more than thirty applicants. A resume can be misleading but the face to face round would be more precise and specific. it would not only, describe the past experiences clearly, but will also enable us to comprehend the linguistic proficiency of the individual.
Currently, majority of the organisation are following the trend. The general pattern being followed include personal interviews, sometimes post a group discussion, followed with round of interviews with CEOs, manager, finance or human resource depending on the job profile. Successful candidates are sent for medical examination. Credit history and criminal record or something that we should include in the process of hiring.
Researchers and philanthropy, devoting their invaluable time and money to ease this process. In my opine, recruitment can also be outsourced, that would reduce fixed cost for the company. A lot of companies have already initiated the process of outsourcing the human resource work to third parties. Even online job portals like monster.com and naukri.com have started providing the services.
To sum up, finding a suitable employee need rigourous effort and had to be a combination of written test, group discussion, interview and reference check. Moreover, outsourcing can nurture better results.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Finding
...ng the entire recruitment process. finding in hiring, right candidate, can be a lo...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 68, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Interviews
...ndidate, can be a long and tedious job. interviews can help expedite the entire process. i...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 117, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...s can help expedite the entire process. it is a must for any conglomerate, company...
^^
Line 5, column 443, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...und would be more precise and specific. it would not only, describe the past exper...
^^
Line 5, column 475, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experiences'.
Suggestion: experiences
...ecific. it would not only, describe the past experiences clearly, but will also enable us to com...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, moreover, so, third, thus, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1557.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5409252669 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03091721069 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640569395018 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.248692673 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.5 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6111111111 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.16666666667 7.06120827912 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0564504790772 0.244688304435 23% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0167300508437 0.084324248473 20% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0197993617964 0.0667982634062 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.034473680471 0.151304729494 23% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0130862673093 0.056905535591 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.