Most large companies nowadays operate multi-nationally. TO what extent multinational companies have responsibilities toward local community in which they operate?
It is true that operational systems have changed greatly as vast numbers of enterprises opt for nationality diversity when employing their candidates. While some people believe that firms ought to operate in a way that serves local community, I opine that they should also consider what leverages their profits.
On the one hand, multinational companies benefit tremendously from opening more ventures worldwide. Such transcontinental expansion allows them to increase their revenues; therefore, they should reciprocate by hiring local people. This would definitely improve people’s life quality as well as society productivity. In addition, such firms exert extra pressure on local resources, such as water, gasoline and the like. Even if these companies pay taxes, this will not compensate for the loss of these nonrenewable resources. As a result, the more foreign companies focus on locals, the more fare the situation becomes.
On the other hand, people mistakenly believe that all the responsibility toward local community lies on the shoulders of foreign organizations. I personally hold the notion that such organizations have the right to target profit solely, and this would make them consider competence while employing people. Since these enterprises operate in a world of competitiveness, they should seek excellence by hiring the most qualified candidates. In addition, all companies have running costs, wages and utilities for instance, which require to continuously be fulfilled by skyrocketing the profits. Thus, it is justified why these firms may not be concerned with nationality when employing people.
To conclude, despite the responsibilities that foreign companies have toward local communities, I reiterate that they own the rights to sought for equip their positions with the most qualified personnel whether of local or foreign nationality.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, in addition, such as, as a result, as well as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1599.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.71071428571 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14589950149 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585714285714 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6731544457 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.214285714 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.92857142857 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276616582009 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0816640961414 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0579703327058 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16831682543 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0352928791991 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.