News stories on tv and in newspapers are very often accompanied by pictures.
Some people say that these pictures are more effective than words.
What is your opinion about this?
Pictures could be seen every where now, they are not limited to children's books or magazines, they are part of newspapers , advertisements and clothes print as well. These days it is very common to see that news broadcast is accompanied by pictures. It is commonly believed by many that photos are more effective than words. I agree with them completely and this essay presents the ideas that prove my agreement.
To begin with, it is undoubtful that pictures have more impact than words because they are more attractive than black and white writing. In this busy lifestyle, we hardly read complete newspaper, we narrow down the reading by looking at pictures and reading selective content by checking its associated picture. Also, pictures are easy to understand than words and it could be easily understandable by any age group. Moreover there is no language barrier to understand a picture. For example, if a person is reading a Chinese newspaper we could not read it but we could guess by the picture that content covers a good news or a sad news.
Another reason that supports the belief that images have better impact than words is that they could depict the real story with true emotions in a better way than words. For example, news of drought would not make a huge impression on us until we see the victims of natural catastrophe in the form of pictures. So, pictures are more powerful than words. I believe that company of pictures had made news more interesting otherwise it would be as equal as reading a novel.
To conclude, I completely agree with those, who believe that pictures have more impact than words. As listed above there are various benefits of adding pictures to the newspaper or news videos. It not only depict the true scene beautifully but also makes the reading interesting. Another important feature of picture that makes it stronger than writing is that it has no language, it could be understandable by every person.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 24, Rule ID: EVERY_WHERE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'everywhere'?
Suggestion: everywhere
Pictures could be seen every where now, they are not limited to childrens ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 122, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...r magazines, they are part of newspapers , advertisements and clothes print as wel...
^^
Line 1, column 414, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ents the ideas that prove my agreement. To begin with, it is undoubtful that pic...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 419, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...easily understandable by any age group. Moreover there is no language barrier to underst...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 628, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'sad news'.
Suggestion: sad news
...ture that content covers a good news or a sad news. Another reason that supports the ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 640, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntent covers a good news or a sad news. Another reason that supports the belief ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 142, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...depict the real story with true emotions in a better way than words. For example,...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, moreover, so, well, for example, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 24.0651302605 175% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1624.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8622754491 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62658750223 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517964071856 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1243249497 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5294117647 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6470588235 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.94117647059 7.06120827912 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260041329076 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.094485997548 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0672728763873 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174996024237 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0364024095406 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.