Now a days, the most important task is the protection of the environment for future generations. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Although there are many pressing issues in the world today, preservation of the environment is an extremely important concern. I agree that humanity should prioritise its address of issues that affect the natural world. This essay will support this position by looking at the government’s role in maintaining human health and the manner in which it provides different resources for human activity.
Firstly, attention ought to be paid to the environment because neglect can lead to a serious decline in healthfulness of population. Air quality could be improved by imposing strict carbon taxes. For example, contemporary industries, which produce hazardous chemicals and effluents directly into the air, thus rendering it hazardous to human health as it contains carcinogenic atoms, those if inhaled, could lead to lung cancer. The ramifications of it can be problematic for many generations, as pervasive illness can make it impossible for communities to build wealth and dig their way out of poverty. This is thus one reason why commitment to the well-being of the natural world is paramount.
Further, reckless use of energy resources can have detrimental effects that last into subsequent generations. In other words, rapid use of these for domestic and commercial purposes will ultimately diminish their availability for future generations. To illustrate, deforestation in parts of Canada and Northern Europe in the 20th Century has altered timber resources in these regions in a way that will require several decades to replenish. If these resources are not replenished, the responsibility will fall on the shoulders of upcoming generations, which is a burden that could make these people less competitive globally.
As above makes clear, ensuring posterity’s inheritance of a healthy natural environment is critical for many reasons. I hope human intelligence and ingenuity continue towards making this possible.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 385, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this if' or 'those ifs'?
Suggestion: this if; those ifs
...alth as it contains carcinogenic atoms, those if inhaled, could lead to lung cancer. The...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, look, so, thus, well, for example, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1647.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60204081633 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20216192473 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615646258503 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6903810949 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.642857143 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.92857142857 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119626523869 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0398983209769 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0377698704489 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0679916090103 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0108802539189 0.056905535591 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.21 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.