Now-a-days, when people get old they often sent to live in a home with other old people where there are nurses to look after them. While such homes generate funds for expenses from family and sponsors, there is a section of society which feel that the government has to pay for this care.
Who do you think should be wholly responsible to pay for this care?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
In many nations, these days, people send their elders in the family to live in old age homes, to live with other older people. They feel that the necessary care is provided at these homes which are organised by trained care takers and specialized nurses. Though sponsors and family members extend financial support, for the functioning of such homes, a certain class of people assert that it is the government responsibility to fund for the care. I, however, believe that it is family and the citizens should be bearing this social responsibility rather than burdening the Government.
The elders are often made to live at centers for old and old age home after a certain age when they need constant monitoring. Hence, families in which both men and women work, feel safe to keep them under expert care. This does not imply that the elders are abandoned. Families need to visit their parents at old age homes too often and be inquiring about their welfare at such places. Such visits serve as emotional boosters for the elders living away from kith and kin. Families should be sponsoring for all their expenses as a token of gratitude and love towards them.
Government, on the other hand, should foster these homes by allocating land for the establishment and provide medical benefits, rather than sponsoring their living. Most of the nations have such policies already implemented for the welfare of the old populace. Allocating furthermore budget for food and clothing would definitely be a stress on the government and leaving no adequate financial resources for other prevailing problems such as unemployment, educational and environmental issues. Therefore, governments and authorities have made sufficient focus on the senior citizens and would be illogical to push the onus on the government.
In conclusion, <span style="font-size: 19.36px;">families and sponsors </span>should be<span style="font-size: 19.36px;"> voluntarily responsible to pay for the care of their elder people</span> instead of shifting the duty on the Government
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 262, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d of shifting the duty on the Government
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, however, if, so, therefore, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1750.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38461538462 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29058761681 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547692307692 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.4937916953 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.666666667 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.93333333333 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285427810023 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0966965026789 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.068564249693 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165623226556 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0940998497057 0.056905535591 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.