Some people use technology to take advice for their medical problems rather than seeing to doctor. Why this is so. It is positive or negative development according to you.

Essay topics:

Some people use technology to take advice for their medical problems rather than seeing to doctor. Why this is so. It is positive or negative development according to you.

Technology has become ubiquitous in every field and everyone’s walk of life and medical field is no exception. Some feel that relying on technology is a better first aid instead of consulting a doctor owing to the fact that treatment would be expensive, if a doctor is involved and also most of the diseases can be cured with basic medication. In my opinion, this seems to be a detrimental tend because the serious problems could be ignored and overlooked with self-medication.

The primary reason that people take tablets or tonics without an expert's advice when they fall sick is due to the speculation of costs involved in the treatment. A doctor usually advises a set of lab tests to diagnose the issue thoroughly before he starts the treatment. Common individuals will definitely get frightened with the prices of this sort of treatment which they feel that they cannot afford. Hence they search over the internet for the symptoms and respective medicines and avoid seeing a doctor.

Another reason is most of the illness is not severe. Cough, cold or fatigue can be treated with few popular medicines such as Crocin, Paracetomal and antibiotics available in the market and these are being promoted by television commercials and popups over internet. A doctor visit is considered only if the patient condition has not improved. This practice of self-medication has been since timely immemorial.

Though self-medication with the help of technology can cure temporary illness, underlying causes may be left unnoticed and lead to serious health consequences in future. At that critical phase, treatment becomes extremely expensive and also could result in life loss. So it is always a better option to have an expert consultation rather than helping ourselves using technology.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d and overlooked with self-medication. The primary reason that people take tabl...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 66, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'experts'' or 'expert's'?
Suggestion: experts'; expert's
...eople take tablets or tonics without an experts advice when they fall sick is due to th...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 405, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...hich they feel that they cannot afford. Hence they search over the internet for the s...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 160, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...and lead to serious health consequences in future. At that critical phase, treatment beco...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 362, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[9]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to use' or 'use'.
Suggestion: to use; use
...sultation rather than helping ourselves using technology.
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, if, look, may, so, sort of, such as, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1507.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21453287197 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97045875179 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636678200692 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.4018545172 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.642857143 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6428571429 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174151593746 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0529482042805 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0387522079798 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0923175311894 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0243969360564 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.