The level of quality of education has downgraded significantly in recent years. Some people opine that students should be encouraged to challenge their teacher’s decisions, and they should start questioning them. Whereas, some individuals think that such actions lead to a tense relationship between students and teachers. Both points of views are discussed in this essay and I hold the opinion that criticizing and challenging teachers would lead to bigger conflicts which are eventually not favorable for students' careers.
Many individuals argue that academic decisions made by teachers should be challenged by pupils as the quality of education has been falling down in the last couple of years. Additionally, pupils are advised by their parents to question teachers' knowledge when they both have a difference in opinion on any study related topic. Many parents in India, for example, hire private tutors for their children as they don't trust the knowledge of professors in schools and colleges. Additionally, students always get their teachers' knowledge tested by external sources like the Internet and private tutors.
On the opposite side, many people think that such actions by students, like criticizing their teachers and arguing with them, are not favorable for the future of students. I totally agree with this point of view as these actions have an adverse effect on the personality of children. Furthermore, they learn bad values with such argumentative behavior. Secondly, students get in the habit of arguing with their elders even if something is advised to them for their own betterment. For example, it has been seen that individuals who don't possess a good reputation with their teachers during their school days always struggle to make a positive impact on people in their adulthood.
To conclude, it has been seen that, nowadays the level of education is going down due to several factors and a lot of individuals recommend people to challenge teachers for academic concerns. On the contrary, many people opine that such actions by students are not beneficial for the future, and I agree with the viewpoint as they inculcate negative values for which they face consequences in later phases of their lives.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 411, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ivate tutors for their children as they dont trust the knowledge of professors in sc...
^^^^
Line 5, column 533, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
..., it has been seen that individuals who dont possess a good reputation with their te...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, whereas, for example, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1883.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 356.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2893258427 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77212183166 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497191011236 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 571.5 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8714707681 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.533333333 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7333333333 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.06666666667 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205337302364 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0795068368402 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0569876668914 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141148977463 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0497423333276 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 411, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ivate tutors for their children as they dont trust the knowledge of professors in sc...
^^^^
Line 5, column 533, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
..., it has been seen that individuals who dont possess a good reputation with their te...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, whereas, for example, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1883.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 356.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2893258427 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77212183166 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497191011236 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 571.5 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8714707681 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.533333333 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7333333333 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.06666666667 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205337302364 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0795068368402 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0569876668914 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141148977463 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0497423333276 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.