Nowadays, families are not as close as in the past and a lot of people have become used to this.
Why is this happening?
Do the advantages of this trend outweigh the drawbacks?
It is incredibly common for modern families to not have a strong familial bonding with each other when compared to the families of yesteryear. There are two major reasons for this development. Although there are some positives to this trend, in my opinion, it is an overwhelmingly negative.
To being with, the fast paced contemporary life might be the the primary reason behind families not having a deeper bond. Because of a hectic work schedule, people may be left with less time to spend quality time with their dear ones; resulting in a weaker development of personal relationships. People may even eschew working over the weekend to earn more money in favor of going on a vacation with family. Another possible reason is immigrating to another country. With globalisation, numerous people are migrating to foreign places, either to work or study. Thus, the geographical distance between may lead to the weakning of bonds because they will not be able to frequenlty meet each other or attend family functions. These circumstances, therefore, are causing families to lose their bondage.
There are two benefits of having not so close contact. To being with, it gives personal space to individuals. In other words, people have the space to do whatever they want without any interference of family members. For instance, single people may date openly as their parents do not hold any sway over their life. Furthermore, people may extricate themselves from family commitments, such as birthdays, anniversaries, or holidays. Since families have become more tolerant of such behaviors, they would not mind if someone do not want to attend a family gathering. Thus, people may have more time on hand to do other things.
Despite the above mentioned advantages, the disadvantages are serious. Firstly, people may feel isolated or go astray should family members are not available to give moral support or guidance. This can cause psychological harm to the well-being of individuals. Secondly, the tradeoff related to social values is an alarming concern. People may develop anti-social behaviour and stop respecting others around them. This is deleterious not just to individuals but also to society. Lastly, communication skill may be on the decline. People may forgot how to speak with families or can get easily annoyed by a mere cynical remark from a family member.
To conclude, although having far-apart families have some upsides, such as personal growth and free time, they do not outweight the downside, namely psychological problems, a decline of social manners, and unpolite speaking manners. People should, therefore, make time for their families so they do not suffer any consequences.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 4, Rule ID: BEING_BEGIN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'begin'?
Suggestion: begin
...it is an overwhelmingly negative. To being with, the fast paced contemporary life ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 58, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...e fast paced contemporary life might be the the primary reason behind families not havi...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 58, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...e fast paced contemporary life might be the the primary reason behind families not havi...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 59, Rule ID: BEING_BEGIN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'begin'?
Suggestion: begin
...fits of having not so close contact. To being with, it gives personal space to indivi...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 525, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'does'.
Suggestion: does
...haviors, they would not mind if someone do not want to attend a family gathering. ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, lastly, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, such as, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2275.0 1615.20841683 141% => OK
No of words: 433.0 315.596192385 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25404157044 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56165014514 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87764078275 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 176.041082164 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556581986143 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 722.7 506.74238477 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 16.0721442886 168% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.5256478731 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.2592592593 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.037037037 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.7037037037 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224641514401 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0647473229503 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0490826335392 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139836298262 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0548031162956 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 78.4519038076 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.