Nowadays food has become easier to prepare. Has this change improved the way people live?Give reasons for your answer using your own ideas and experience.

In this day and age, preparing food is effortless amidst busy schedules. Recent research for World Health Organization shows that about 70% of the people prefer home-made food and people show more interest towards cooking since food preparation has become easy. This transformation has got a lot of improvements in the livelihood of the people which we will be discussing in the essay.

Firstly, cooking process has been made simple and healthy in recent days. Because of the introduction of various cooking tools such as Induction stove, Microwave oven, Grinder and the Blender, cooking time has been drastically reduced by 2 hours a day compared to twenty years ago. My mother used to prepare a cake with the help of pressure cooker for 3 hours however I use the microwave oven to bake a cake for about 20 minutes. This example proves how the cooking tools save time and effort of cooking. Leveraging these tools, we are able to prepare multi-cuisine food like Pizza, Pasta, Noodles apart from our traditional food varieties.

Additionally, consuming home-made foods saves the cost in many ways. We can avoid visiting restaurants, eventually, it saves the money of transportation, cost of food, giving tips to the waiters etc. With the advancement in cutting-edge technology, the recipes of food variety available across the globe are accessible at the fingertips. We can prepare sumptuously as well as healthy food at a cheap money and we can mitigate the risk of diseases that are spread through outside foods. Last week, for my toddler’s birthday I was able to cook for 20 people with the total cost of 2000 rupees, whereas if I had arranged food from outside it would cost around 5000 rupees at the least.

All things considered, with the improvements in tools and technology, it catalyzes the taste of the food as well as fortifies healthy diet to the consumers.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, well, whereas, apart from, as for, such as, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1572.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00636942675 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85618192055 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585987261146 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6702913304 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.285714286 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4285714286 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92857142857 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156384588154 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0540314406532 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0358964979478 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0972939773148 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0439925397259 0.056905535591 77% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.