Nowadays many business meetings and training are happening online and not in real offices. Do you think advantages outweigh the disadvantages in this matter?
By the advent of technology, life has been changed in various aspects. Among these changes, Internet revolutionize significantly the means of communication. Many support telecommunication for business meeting while others believe in meeting face-to-face, rather than online meeting.
Admittedly, online meeting not only is convenient, but also is more environmentally friendly by cutting down travels to offices, causing less carbon footprints. For instance, travelling by plane or vehicles decrease remarkably. Meanwhile, it is more time-saving by pressing the buttons, instead of commuting back-and-forth to offices, and stocking in traffic jam. These rather beneficial points, encourage both employees and employers to utilize telecommunication as well as online conferences as it is more prevalent in the recent century.
On the other hand, although online meeting brings various advantages, the picture has a dark side. Technology is not necessarily trustful. Many problems can come up during the meeting, leading to disturb the conference and pose inconvenience. Similarly important, Telecommunication could bring misconception or misunderstanding as it could rarely happen in face-to-face meeting due to incapability of online meeting to convey feeling and emotion. Additionally, although online meeting such as video conferencing, file shaving, and Telecommunication is comfortable, they encourage sedentary lifestyle, leading to deteriorate consequences such as obesity and diabetes. Thus, not always the easiest way is the best of it.
To sum up, from my point of view, a balance of both means is suggested. Online meeting is neither a deterrent nor a constructive. Albeit online meeting is beneficial for distant locations, face-to-face meeting should be included in one agenda.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 287, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ore time-saving by pressing the buttons, instead of commuting back-and-forth to o...
^^
Line 3, column 244, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
... the conference and pose inconvenience. Similarly important, Telecommunication could brin...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 115, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[1]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...line meeting is neither a deterrent nor a constructive. Albeit online meeting is beneficial fo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, similarly, so, thus, well, while, for instance, such as, as well as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 7.30460921844 0% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1537.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.95736434109 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.59133365524 2.80592935109 128% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.631782945736 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.3227202982 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0625 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.125 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175331053961 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.050442016825 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0502123729685 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10696112127 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0157993928002 0.056905535591 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.86 50.2224549098 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.99 12.4159519038 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.0 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.