Nowadays many companies have manufacturing facilities in different countries
There is no denying fact the phenomenon of twing production facilities in many nations is ---------across the globe due to its paramount importance. Once school of thought opines that is worthless, however other consider that a couple of problems occur because of the same. Although this has a plethora of merits, numerous demerits are also there which will be elaborated in upcoming paragraphs.
Initiating with the best possible benefits the most significant advantage in opening a production facility in another country is the reduction in manufacturing cost. The rate of raw materials different in various countries. When the product making in cheaper rate in other places and Selling in different parts can gain profit for the industries. Among with that, the quality of an item will be differed when producing from different country. To cite with an example, some companies make parts of electronic items and assemble in where electronic rate is reasonable rate and export and selling things in higher rates. As a result, this manifestation is beneficial for business improvement.
On the paradoxical side, there are many drawbacks as well, first and foremost, although outsourcing manufacturing cost is less, it also introduces a variety of challenging and risks hurting profits. Due to communication barriers, dependence of suspicious control and public relations. Which affects the business. Secondly, when comes to disadvantages, shipping concerns is also a factor, when the manufacturer cost is low, a colocial amount of money needed to transport items to selling to the company. Consequently, there is no benefit in bringing products in low costs.
To conclude, without any doubt. This is a mixed bag this topic has many positives the negative points of this notion may not be underestimated
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 285, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...uspicious control and public relations. Which affects the business. Secondly, when co...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 392, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...shipping concerns is also a factor, when the manufacturer cost is low, a colocial...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1525.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36971830986 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09125852847 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612676056338 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.9625766778 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.3125 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.75 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1767325892 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0433303534463 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0473696442447 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0822665142413 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459618818397 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.57 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.98 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.