Nowadays, more and more children play computer games. Why do you think this is the case? Is it a positive or negative development?
Technological gadgets are becoming increasingly popular, allowing children to spend a significant amount of time on the computer by playing various games. However, this is mainly happening because of the highly addictive nature of games, and I firmly believe that it has undoubtedly negative development on children.
Although playing games offers positive benefits like improvements in cognitive abilities and gaming skills, these advantages often lead children to spend considerable time on the computer screen. These games are so interesting that children always feel they play continuously. As a result, this addictive behaviour always leads them to stay on video games, adversely affecting their mental health. Moreover, children deliberately forget about social and academic life when they are too involved with online games.
There are several downsides commonly associated with some children spending maximum time on website games. One of the major concerns is that these games significantly affect the academic performance of primary students. Due to game addiction, they cannot concentrate on their education, which often leads them to fail formal examinations. Another problem connected with children is that it is detrimental to one's health. In other words, spending excessive time on computer screens strains children's eyes, and these games bring severe health issues such as insomnia, depression and anxiety. For example, children who play games cannot sleep well, which will change their behaviour, eventually not engaging socially with parents.
In conclusion, while games positively affect children, health problems and poor academic performance are crucial factors to state that this is an overall negative development. However, if parents put strict supervision on children, computer games will have a positive influence on them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 409, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...h children is that it is detrimental to ones health. In other words, spending excess...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1586.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.83088235294 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82688793821 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632352941176 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.7424216737 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.285714286 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4285714286 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42857142857 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23606653264 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0886314464728 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0516404140362 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166287177701 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0336582482289 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.53 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.86 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.