Nowadays many young people are attracted to dangerous sports. What makes these activities so attractive? What measures should be taken to regulate such sports and minimize their risks?
These days life-risking sports have become the center of attraction among young people. It is popular because youngsters are more inclined to take risks and challenge their limits. However, with proper measures to lower the risk, these sports could be proved as productive.
Young individuals are full of high spirits and drive to do anything without looking into consequences. This type of hunger can be easily fulfilled by indulging in life-threatening sports. It gives them adrenaline rush to feed their idea of living on the edge by risking the most precious thing they have which is life. It is often reported that risky sports like wrestling and boxing are mostly participated by youngsters and the common reason is to cross their ultimate limits.
The state plays a key role in mitigating high risks in some sports. Firstly, they should completely ban sports with the risk of losing life because there are fewer chances to overcome this threat in such sports. One of the example of this sport is kickboxing as the percentage of death and life-changing injuries are alarmingly high. Secondly, there should be rules to limit the risk to be taken in sports. In other words, sports should only be allowed to take risks which can easily be recovered and should not be seriously affecting the participants in any way.
In conclusion, sports should always be a part of youngsters life but risking life for the name of the sport is not bravery from any angle. The government needs to keep young people away from such risks and put proper rules to protect the lives of the participants of such sports.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 281, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ves of the participants of such sports.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, in conclusion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1339.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92279411765 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63356189376 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558823529412 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 405.9 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.3420130364 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.6428571429 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4285714286 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294896501218 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106461149396 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0626580388759 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186710774509 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0568389180111 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.