Nowadays modern gadgets are widely used by young people and the use of these products reduces their creativity.Do you agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

Nowadays modern gadgets are widely used by young people and the use of these products reduces their creativity.
Do you agree or disagree?

It is argued that smart devices youngsters are attached to them nowadays could diminish their power of innovation. This essay is completely against this idea because such gadgets provide the young people with a reliable source of information that they need, and enable them to interact and communicate with their peers the world over which can contribute to better creative young minds.

The main reason why mobiles, for example, help the new generations of scientists and engineers to be better inventors or creators of novel ideas and products is that they can rely on these devices to surf the world wide web and get the information they might be looking for instantly and effortlessly. If we compare this situation with the older generations, it will be crystal clear that they would dream to have such tools in their time as it would save them a great deal of time, effort and money. A recent research conducted by Science for All magazine revealed that the new patent numbers last 5 years in the USA and China are equal to the sum of all those issued last century in all countries all over the world.

In addition to this, modern electronic gadgets are often connected to the internet and hence it allow users to keep in touch with new ideas from any other place world wide. In other words, it raises the level of communication and interconnection among the youth which allow them to adopt any new ideas or technologies they admire. For example, last year we had a new product in almost every town in Egypt, which has been street solar lights. In fat, this product was developed by an Egyptian student studying in technical institute in Cairo who got inspired by a similar product that he knew about it while chatting with his German friend in Frankfurt through his iPhone.

In conclusion, smart gadgets are acting as a leverage to creativity and innovation because it does not only secure an easy access to unlimited source of information and creative ideas, but it also provide young people a powerful tool of communication that enable sharing, developing and exchange ideas and innovations.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 97, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'allows'?
Suggestion: allows
... connected to the internet and hence it allow users to keep in touch with new ideas f...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 162, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: worldwide
...uch with new ideas from any other place world wide. In other words, it raises the level of...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 162, Rule ID: WORLD_WIDE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'worldwide'?
Suggestion: worldwide
...uch with new ideas from any other place world wide. In other words, it raises the level of...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 116, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'easy access'.
Suggestion: easy access
...ovation because it does not only secure an easy access to unlimited source of information and ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 198, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'provides'?
Suggestion: provides
...rmation and creative ideas, but it also provide young people a powerful tool of communi...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, look, so, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1755.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 360.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.875 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59699345398 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577777777778 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 544.5 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 20.2975951904 177% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.0449853356 49.4020404114 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 175.5 106.682146367 165% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.0 20.7667163134 173% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.4 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119600942265 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0465967539256 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0323899551753 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.075013755925 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0292071488728 0.056905535591 51% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.6 13.0946893788 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.4 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.62 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 9.78957915832 189% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 10.1190380762 162% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.