3. Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.
In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make?
Has this become a positive or negative development?
The way in which an individual communicates with another has undoubtedly changed over the last decades. This has not included only the advert the-state-of-the art means of communications, such as smart phones and the internet, but it has also revolutionized our educational system. This essay completely agrees that this is a positive shift towards a brighter future because the ease, flexibility and accessibility technological advancements are offering to almost everybody the world over.
When people start using smart mobiles that has an internet access all the day around, this makes it extremely comfort to make a call to another relative on the other side of the world, text a message to a workmate in another country, or even have a video chat as a part of work interview process to join another company. In the past, if a person wanted to communicate with a colleague living abroad, it would take at least two weeks to have that letter eventually reached its destination. Added to this, a huge a mount of money it had to be paid to getting such services, including post office and transportation fees. To illustrate how significant smart devices and internet are, a recent study by a 'Telecommunication Today' magazine, revealed that it cost in average 2 dollars and took 5 days to send a one paper letter from New York to Ottawa in 1980s, whereas at the present it costs almost no money and takes less than a second to send the same content through WhatsApp application, for example.
Having said that, it is obvious that this is a beneficial enhancement because it serves humans in many ways whatever where they are and through which walks of life they are interested. This because the ease and convenience it guarantees that makes citizens keep more close and in touch than it has ever happened before. In addition, the impact on education is substantial; people can access better educational opportunities and enroll in any course of their choice as long as these programmes are available online. This does not only help many people all over the world to get higher degrees while working, but it also enable many who is living in remote areas far from any universities or schools to get homeschooling and join online colleges. For instance, my cousin got a bachelor's degree in law last year from a prestigious French law institution, despite the fact that he has never been to France.
In conclusion, having demonstrated the aforementioned ideas, it can be concluded that the advancements in communication technology has been advantageous in many ways, such as connecting people together effortlessly and it is worth mentioning that it makes education more available, flexible and accessible for more people the world over.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 117, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nged over the last decades. This has not included only the advert the-state-of-th...
^^
Line 3, column 846, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1980s'.
Suggestion: in the 1980s
...ne paper letter from New York to Ottawa in 1980s, whereas at the present it costs almost...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 620, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'enables'?
Suggestion: enables
...gher degrees while working, but it also enable many who is living in remote areas far ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, so, whereas, while, at least, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2290.0 1615.20841683 142% => OK
No of words: 456.0 315.596192385 144% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02192982456 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62105577807 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02038574867 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 268.0 176.041082164 152% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587719298246 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 739.8 506.74238477 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 20.2975951904 172% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 82.2221698029 49.4020404114 166% => OK
Chars per sentence: 176.153846154 106.682146367 165% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.0769230769 20.7667163134 169% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.84615384615 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194060809672 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0639328389373 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447879311002 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118770784768 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0312427322906 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.8 13.0946893788 151% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.95 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.9 11.3001002004 150% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.43 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.1190380762 158% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.