Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.
In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make? Has this been a positive or negative development?
With advancement in technology, there has been a drastic transformation in the way people communicate with each other. Many people believe that technology has negative impact on relationships, however, the positive aspect of technology cannot be denied.
It is an undeniable fact that technology has made human life easier. Firstly, with mobile phones and internet, people can connect with anyone instantly. Services such as Skype ,Whatsapp etc have open new opportunities of doing business globally, without even travelling. For example, people can send pictures of the sample to their clients over Whatsapp messenger or even do a video call to clear their queries. Secondly, technology has opened new possibilities for students to study from home. For instance, many universities have launched distant learning programs in which a student can have a one on one session with teachers without physically present at the university.
Nevertheless, the modern way of interaction has some negative implications as well. The availability of new communication technologies have resulted in, isolating people and discouraging real interaction. For example, many young people choose to make friends online rather than mixing with their peers in the real world, and these ‘virtual’ relationships are a poor substitute for real friendships. Furthermore, the authenticity of the person on the social sites is always questionable and can result into cyber crimes . For example, any Tom, Dick and Harry can make a fake profile on social network sites such a Facebook or Instagram and send you a friend request.
In conclusion, technology has certainly revolutionised communication between people, but not all the outcomes of this revolution have been positive.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 83, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...been a drastic transformation in the way people communicate with each other. Many...
^^
Line 5, column 176, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...anyone instantly. Services such as Skype ,Whatsapp etc have open new opportunities...
^^
Line 9, column 529, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ionable and can result into cyber crimes . For example, any Tom, Dick and Harry ca...
^^
Line 15, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f this revolution have been positive.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, then, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1511.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.65917602996 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26238707301 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644194756554 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9047311828 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.928571429 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0714285714 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2857142857 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279079066353 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0939853959232 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0931970181843 0.0667982634062 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184893251104 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129992250921 0.056905535591 228% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.