Nowadays more and more people have to compete with young people for the same jobs.What problems does this cause? What are some possible solutions?
Undoubtedly, distnict age group denizens are encouterning some hard efforts to grab employment opportunities in comparison of young aspirants for same designation. This essay asserts that possible cause behind this phenomenon is the technical advancement in every sector and this hassle could be margnialised through the prudent measures of supermacy.
Since, world is in the state of flux therefore being flexible with the circumstances is an impecaable option and history has always been the evidence of single occurance. Seemingly, older people experience hurdles while adopting the technological changes whereas youngsters are equipped with required knowledge and expertise. Moreover, the adventures attitude and commendable enthusiasm of avid adults are the pragmatic demands of corporate world and elder generation lacks exactly there. For instance, as per the census documented by UNO stating that Information Technology is appearing as emerging sector across the globe in which around 75% employed individuals are of the
21-40 age group due to their versatile qualities and innovative ideas.
To continue, the plausible solution to address the menace is to organise multiple highly designed seminars as well as training programms in corporations at the expense of governments . Even though it would be an extra burden on offical budget but the favourable outcomes will addition in human capital. Furthermore, these steps will bestow job seekers with ample employment chances to secure a place in ever-progressing world. To site an exemple, in South Korea state authority is arranging exceptionally talented supervisors to provide guidance in respect of computer skills to reduce the unemployment rate among upper age group dwellers.
To conclude, this trend is going escalate in morrow because IT has taken the ground in the every walk of life and technophobic will not be having place in upcoming future. Thus, proficiency is necessary in order to thrive in this era.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 576, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...UNO stating that Information Technology is appearing as emerging sector across the globe in ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 183, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...rporations at the expense of governments . Even though it would be an extra burden...
^^
Line 7, column 624, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ce the unemployment rate among upper age group dwellers. To conclude, this t...
^^
Line 7, column 642, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t rate among upper age group dwellers. To conclude, this trend is going escalat...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, whereas, while, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1694.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62790697674 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04116314982 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.691029900332 0.561755894193 123% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.1245394908 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.166666667 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0833333333 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135539871365 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0409026498439 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0363190374687 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0613815072058 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0507967975193 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.67 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.17 8.58950901804 130% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.