It is argued that in the last years there was a change in society and the traditional family format is disappearing slowly. There are different opinions about the social impact, and many consider it will be negative in the future. I totally disagree with this statement because it is a fact that the social organization changes along the time, and it is very common that any change is observed as a possible danger.
First of all, the youth had had new opportunities in the work market in the last decades, taking them into emancipation. Before, those possibilities were reserved to families chiefs and women were not incorporated in the work world. Currently, that scenery is totally different. For instance, now the rates of the emancipation of young people are between 19 and 23 years; thirty years ago were between 25 and 30 years. Thus, it is not strange that the traditional family format is changing with the new chances for the young group.
Secondly, the dwelling trend is more directed to studio apartments, designed for one, two or three people and mostly they are located in the cities where the principal economic activities run. Now, it is usual that many people share an apartment, food, and expenses. For example, the cost of living has increased in the last years and this factor had affected the options of people, moving them to share spaces. Thereby, the economic issues are molding the social organization, pushing people to look for other options, very different from the past.
To conclude, it is a normal event that the social organization changes in relation to the economic environment and that inevitably will switch the family order to different forms of society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 25, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: had
...ible danger. First of all, the youth had had new opportunities in the work market in...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, second, secondly, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1418.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97543859649 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67244065569 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557894736842 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6532601706 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.076923077 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9230769231 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92307692308 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0908243071681 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0294070413128 0.084324248473 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0285222846504 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0485411899138 0.151304729494 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0348595626493 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.