Nowadays there is a growing trend of private car ownership. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages or environmental problems associated with this?
Opinions are divided on whether the benefits of owning a car outweigh its drawbacks. I believe that the environmental impact of this trend is too serious to support its advantage.
It is a widely held belief that private car ownership is preferable for various reasons, the most important of which relate to self-reliance and saving time. With regard to the former, car owners feel free to go wherever they want without having to restrict themselves to the vagaries of public transport, or to be dependent on others to drive them to their destination. As for saving time, they could choose an alternate route if there is congestion on road, which would not be possible otherwise with public transport. The truth is that they could save more time by driving on their own instead of setting their schedule as per the availability of public transport.
However, the above-mentioned advantages have been achieved at a significant environmental cost in terms of natural resource depletion and air pollution. As far as resource exhaustion is concerned, oil reserves are depleting rapidly, which means that this trend of private car ownership is exploiting more resources because most of the cars run on either petrol or diesel. Polluting air is another drawback of having more personal cars. Evidence of this can be seen in the fact that the harmful gases emitted from the combustion of fossil fuels lead to poor air quality and are directly associated with climate change.
In conclusion, although driving personal cars seems to be more convenient by saving time and being independent, it has an adverse environmental impact. For this reason, I believe that the disadvantages related to non-renewable resource deficiency and pollution are too severe to justify the advantages.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, as for, in conclusion, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1493.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18402777778 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95167278046 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59375 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0988882593 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.416666667 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222557099112 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0742507079124 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0490657759312 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131250148064 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0451350173942 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.