Some people think that good teamwork makes a company successful, others think that good leadership is the reason behind the success of a company. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
Opinions are divided on whether the success of any organization depends on team collaboration or team management. I believe that both of these factors equally play a vital role in the growth of a company.
A firm achieves a great height of success through teamwork because of the combined talents of the members and increased productivity. With regard to the former, every individual in a team brings together different skill sets and one's own area of expertise that helps in generating creative ideas. This contribution not only develops innovative products and solutions for a company but also spreads positivity in an entire group. The joint efforts of team members also boost the overall performance of a team. This is due to the fact that workload is shared among all the members and everyone can focus on their individual assignments. As a result of this increased efficiency and energized process, an enterprise meets its target on time.
In contrast, the role of an effective team leader cannot be neglected because he is responsible for the team supervision, and developing strategies. As far as guidance and support are concerned, a supervisor shows direction to his workforce and communicates company goals. He also provides valuable feedback to them to perform well. Without this supervision, a team would not be able to complete its task within a given timeframe. As for strategy development, a manager defines a process that all others follow and allocates resources to his team for carrying out their duties. This strategic planning is a key aspect for any industry to be successful.
In conclusion, both teamwork and good leadership are crucial elements that make a company successful and go hand-in-hand.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, well, as for, in conclusion, in contrast, as a result, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1455.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19642857143 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01399583914 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603571428571 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.5418990258 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.0 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86666666667 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127627609017 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0427935978727 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0791609606851 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119101546547 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116024878889 0.056905535591 204% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.