These days the advancement in technology has brought a change in the way people communicate with one another. While there are some negative impacts, the advantages far outweigh the disadvantages.
To begin with, in the early days people had to go out to interact or meet friends. Nowadays, social media such as Facebook and Whatsapp has made communication very easy. They even have special features like video calls and conference call where everyone can talk as well as see each other thus providing a sense of closeness. Secondly, the internet, which was earlier considered to be a privilege, is now become very cheap and accessible. Consequently, people can just make new friends or keep in touch with old one's just by the click of their fingertips. Just at the comfort of your home one can stay updated and socialize.
Likewise, mobile applications have been developed for those interested in a relationship as well for those who are interested in friendship. Even though currently relationships are very fickle and many do not last long, there have been some success stories. Similarly, there as so many mediums to contact a person as everybody has at least some online presence. For instance, many find their lost childhood friends or school teachers on social media and connect with them to reminisce about the past. Therefore, technology has bridged the gap for now no one is beyond reach.
In conclusion, there are some ill effects of technology, but the impact is has had on bringing people closer is massive. It has completely omitted the need to physically meet people and revive lost friendships.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 223, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ve special features like video calls and conference call where everyone can talk ...
^^
Line 5, column 377, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun find seems to be countable; consider using: 'many finds'.
Suggestion: many finds
...ast some online presence. For instance, many find their lost childhood friends or school ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, likewise, second, secondly, similarly, so, therefore, thus, well, while, at least, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1351.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04104477612 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82776497146 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634328358209 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.9911984507 49.4020404114 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.0666666667 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8666666667 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224463912586 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0626712425126 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.059109276509 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130659909696 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0470413846064 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.