Nowadays, young people love using goods from luxurious brands even though they cost a huge amount of money. Discuss the causes and effects of this trend.
Nowadays, it is observed that young people love using goods from luxurious brands even though they cost a huge amount of money. The causes and effects which can be foreseen of this trend will be analyzed in this essay.
One of the reasons is that most of the foods from luxurious brands have high quality. They are produced with good input materials and demanding standards so the quality of luxurious brands is often higher than other simple brands’. Therefore, it is obvious that many young people are satisfied with them. Secondly, owing to the marketing of these brands, people thought that using such luxurious goods makes them feel more confident. It is believed that the people who can buy expensive goods are wealthy. They feel more confident if the food they eat, the smartphone they use, the clothes they wear are expensive and unique. For this reason, young people seem to show off themselves through luxurious brands goods.
Due to the fact of this trend, it could course some impact on society. First of all, in terms of economy, it can cause the financial crisis. Most of the young people who have a low salary and still rely on their family do not have enough money for such luxurious goods. Thus, when using use too much money on lavish things, they can not buy other essentials, save for their future life and they even might be in debt. The second effect is that this trend can produce discrimination in society. The poor who can not afford luxurious goods may feel inferior to the affluent people.
In conclusion, I believe that unless they are really well off, young people should not use a huge amount of money on luxurious brands.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, really, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, well, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1372.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74740484429 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25435646225 2.80592935109 80% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543252595156 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 405.9 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.4308371315 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 85.75 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0625 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4375 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.516651351787 0.244688304435 211% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15945569093 0.084324248473 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.14096683074 0.0667982634062 211% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.357277494295 0.151304729494 236% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.151701415651 0.056905535591 267% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 50.2224549098 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 11.3001002004 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.97 12.4159519038 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 78.4519038076 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.