In this day and age, an increasing number of contemporaries are shopping excessively on online websites. As a result, online shopping has become more popular than ever before. This trend might pose positive impacts on the environment and employment patterns in the short run, but it may do more harm than good in the long run.
In terms of the environment, the popularity of online shopping could help reduce the number of car journeys to physical stores and the amount of associated greenhouse emissions. A delivery truck, for example, is able to carry large amounts of goods, which, if carried by a private car, would require hundreds of trips, emitting a huge amounts of carbon emissions into the atmosphere. In the long run, however, the convenience of shopping on Internet might encourage people to buy more, and this would increase the number of delivery vehicles, releasing amount of colossal exhaust which in turn results in acid rain, global warming and affects the overall well-being of people negatively.
Regarding the effects on the types of jobs in labour market, the growing popularity of online shopping has created various employment opportunities. A college student lacking money to cover tuition, for example, thanks to online shopping, he would have a golden opportunity to find edible jobs such as web designer or delivery driver in order to enhance his lifestyle and living standard without affecting his academic training. However, this kind of shopping might lead to the bankruptcy of traditional retailers, putting many people at the risk of unemployment. As a result, the number of jobless people would outnumber the number of job openings created by the rapid development of online shopping.
From these above mentioned reasons, the conclusion can be drawn that online shopping has double-edge impacts on the environment and employment. Despite the benefits, it is outweighed by the drawbacks ranging from environmental issue like air pollution to a huge number of the unemployed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 336, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'amount'?
Suggestion: amount
...uire hundreds of trips, emitting a huge amounts of carbon emissions into the atmosphere...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, regarding, so, well, for example, kind of, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1695.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26397515528 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87765557105 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583850931677 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.383561998 49.4020404114 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.25 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8333333333 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268947867396 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0934340568118 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0468628286429 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146610024311 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0492928736864 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.