The ownership of cars should be restricted to one per family in order to reduce traffic congestion and pollution. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In the last decade, the number of cars is increased tremendously in most of the cities around the world. It has created a burden on the authorities to control the traffic and other environmental side effects created by this sudden surge in cars. This essay totally agrees that government should implement “one car one family policy and suggests that public transport should be enhanced to attract masses.
Firstly, more cars on the roads will create more traffic resulting in congestions and road blocks. Also, motorcars produce dangerous gasses that are very harmful to human beings. A recent study by World Health Organisation revealed that the air quality, in the big cities around the world, is not in healthy index for public. As a result, people living in these locations are in danger of catching chest and lungs diseases. So, laws should be introduced to decrease personal cars to control gasses that pollute and contaminate the air.
Secondly, it is observed that people like to drive big cars. It can be noticed that one person will be riding in SUV that can carry seven people. When multiple people will drive these big cars, it will create pressure on existing roads network. As a result, people will take hours to cover small distances. One car one family will force siblings to use single vehicle or to use public transport. So, the rush on the roads will be decreased.
On the other hand, it is right of a human to use any facility the way he likes. For example, if a family can afford multiple cars, they should be allowed to have as many as they like. Governments should find other ways to reduce pollution and should expand roads.
In conclusion, laws should be created to bar families to purchase more than one car. They should be educated about the side effects on the environment. It is also suggested that more focus should be done on public transport.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In the last decade, the number of cars i...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 7.85571142285 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1573.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46523568493 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532307692308 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 484.2 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.1437814979 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 78.65 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.25 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218087628564 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0666402480299 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0640434093293 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132296181497 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0430151837951 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.0946893788 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.