Parents of obese children should be punished for making their children fat. Do you agree or disagree?
Childhood obesity is becoming a grave concern as children from different demographics of the world are becoming morbidly obese. It has been argued that mothers and fathers should be penalized for the excessive weight of their offspring. This essay, however, disagrees with this notion as parents cannot look after their child’s calorific allowance all day and genetic factors also play a crucial role in a child’s healthy physique.
Nowadays, children spend a significant amount of time at schools, where parents are absent to supervise their offspring’s diet. Obviously, most of the pupils at school love to eat at their school’s cafeteria, which usually serves unhealthy food options, and makes the pupils pre-disposed to carrying extra weight. For instance, a survey carried out by WHO suggests that a child consumes 75% of its daily calorific allowance during attending classes at school. Therefore, punishing parents for the unhealthy food being served by schools is preposterous.
Apart from this, an individual’s genes and metabolism is also accountable in deciding whether one will gain weight or stay fit. Since genetic factors cannot be controlled by parents, they should not be punished for this because this factor is out of the control of them. To put it another words, how a mom can be given punishment for the sluggish metabolism of her son or daughter. Thus, mother and father are not at all eligible for any kind of penalisation for this issue.
To conclude, mom and dads of overweight offspring cannot be punished for their child’s weight issues because they are unable to look after their dietary pattern and are not to be blamed for genetic abnormalities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 443, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ole in a child's healthy physique. Nowadays, children spend a significant a...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, so, therefore, thus, apart from, for instance, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1445.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3125 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96701654455 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.613970588235 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1797177967 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.416666667 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.58333333333 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275960335353 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102187638213 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0579022290625 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167428151776 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0214088155122 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.