People nowadays are not fit and active than the people from olden days. Discuss the causes for this situation and suggest possible solutions.
Ubiquitously, an increasing population lacks fitness levels than its previous generation. Majorly, technological advancements and work culture are giving rise to this serious menace. However, there are some handy solutions but it requires participation from the every stakeholder.
There are ample of causes related to health issues in the current generation. Primarily, the root cause is the advent of technologically advanced gadgets. These, however made people’s lives easier than ever, at the same time, made them couch potatoes. For instance, using mobile phones attributes to a solitary lifestyle, because of its wide range offerings on one click. Thus, reducing much physical activity than it used to be in the past with little use of these gadgets. More seriously, today’s work culture has also left no stone unturned to create this mess. To meet the two ends, the masses are working over-time, leaving a rare chance for body exercise.
A solution to this growing negative trend is to involvement of masses to educate about its repercussions. It might not be a magic bullet but would still work wonders if teenagers and adults are targeted alike. Schools can play a vital role by implementing mandatory exercise sessions, with alongside description of its long-term benefits. This might create positive winds of change, propagating it to their families. At the same time, an active participation of parents, to bring up their children through encouragement in outdoor activities, restricting video games. Thus, such combination would encourage lifestyle changes from grass-root levels.
In conclusion, our societies have been engulfed with some serious illnesses than our elders due to changes in lifestyle. However, implementation of these solutions could become a way to address it.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, still, thus, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 7.30460921844 0% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1541.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56317689531 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04671753146 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.689530685921 0.561755894193 123% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 19.6100881068 49.4020404114 40% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 85.6111111111 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3888888889 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 7.06120827912 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141341175935 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0368733732249 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0229473051796 0.0667982634062 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0746805839881 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0408956004436 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.33 50.2224549098 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.67 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.85 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.