A rise in the living standard of the country seems to only benefit the cities rather than rural areas. What problems might this difference cause? How might the problems be reduced?
A conspicuous trend observed on the global scale is the gorging gap of development in living standards of urban and rural areas. this might trigger a revolution for rights and shake faith in governments. The likely solution to tackle this issue is to uplift the rural sections.
There are several repercussions that might be incurred as a result of this division of this upshot benefitting on the urban population. Primarily, there might be a hike in the clashes between rural regions and the governments in power for shrugging them off their rights. this trend might result in ill payment of taxes to the government, hurting the treasuries, impacting the economies. More seriously, this alienation might cast a doubt on the government’s intentions. If such scenarios crop up, it might lead to boycotting of government by and large by the citizens, thus administrative machinery might cease to function.
There is an obvious way of bringing things back on the track. Majorly, the treatment of suburbans should be on the par with urban areas. this would not only instill a feeling as part of one nation but also aid them with services from which they were earlier casted out. With a variety of services at their disposal, these people would not have to shift to the cities for higher education or for treating chronic medical conditions and so on. thus, improving the conditions in rural landscapes, equipping them with their rights is the key to mitigate this spiraling issue.
In conclusion, governments could certainly implement a fair treatment to enhance the quality of life for all countrymen.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 130, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...ing standards of urban and rural areas. this might trigger a revolution for rights a...
^^^^
Line 5, column 273, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...er for shrugging them off their rights. this trend might result in ill payment of ta...
^^^^
Line 9, column 138, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
... should be on the par with urban areas. this would not only instill a feeling as par...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, thus, in conclusion, as a result, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1354.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10943396226 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91032216088 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.603773584906 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 400.5 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.5655539815 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.7142857143 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9285714286 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22874813129 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.077320163542 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0490094074412 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119309171772 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0874429926368 0.056905535591 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.