People spend a lot of money on various things as they earn more money nowadays than before.
Is it a positive or negative development?
Due to access to good education and better opportunities, millennial earn a lot more money than their parents did in the former days. Whether it is good development? This is further assessed in the essay below.
With greater earning power, many things have become affordable for middle-income class people for example liberty to pursue higher education. In olden days, getting a world-class degree was not accessible to all and only limited few were entitled to complete their education. In developing nation, a decade ago, travelling by planes was considered luxury for a commoner. With more salaries, people travel to far off destinations and spend a splendid time off with their family and friends. With enough salaries, a working class can save enough money without worrying about his retirement, instead, nowadays, many youths consider become entrepreneurs in a short time frame of their career.
However, every coin has a flip side, more incomes makes people reckless and they spend money on unwanted items and gadgets. According to the financial data, Apple shipped 9.2 million Apple Watch units during the fourth quarter of the year 2018. To impress others, people tend to flaunt their wealth and expensive possessions, which has bolstered unhealthy relationships and increased animosity between neighbours. The parity between have and have-nots have widened multi-folds.
In conclusion, money is essential for meeting ends meet and lead a comfortable life. More money allows people to fulfil their dreams, however, excessive money leaves them lonely and enslaves them with the wish to have it all.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 523, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'class'?
Suggestion: class
...riends. With enough salaries, a working class can save enough money without worrying ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1363.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38735177866 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.727960044 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.660079051383 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 414.9 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6569691981 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.3571428571 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0714285714 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.78571428571 7.06120827912 39% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246468391583 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0745366740252 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0741197548927 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150594650145 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0382936435827 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.