People today are not as fit as they were in the past.
What are the causes of this?
What can governments do to deal with this issue?
Nowadays, a large number of people are overweight and are not as fit as the previous generations were. In this essay, I am going to consider what reasons are behind such a negative tendency and how the government can address it.
The main reason for it is the more sedentary lifestyle than it was in the past. Modern people tend to spend a huge amount of time sitting in front of computers in offices or doing other non-active jobs. In addition, as cars are not luxuries anymore almost every family owns it and as a result, they prefer even on a short distance driving rather than going on foot. The second reason is that modern citizens eat an excessive amount of fast food, which is high in salt, sugar and saturated fat. Meanwhile, our ancestors had a much healthier choice of products and food plate mostly consisted of fresh vegetable, whole grains and meat.
In my opinion, in order to tackle the issue mentioned above, governments should encourage people to do sports and other activities by the promotion of a healthy lifestyle. For instance, the authorities could allocate fund for social free of charge sports clubs for children and seniors or construct workout grounds for everyone. As well as this, it would be great to conduct competitions where non-professional athletes were able to participate. Additionally, the government should oblige canned food and soft drink producers as well as fast-food chains’ owners to reduce the amount of sugar and salt contained in produced food. In fact, authorities should imply strict regulationцs of quality and ¬ of produced food and meals prepared in cafes and restaurants. Consequently, all the mentioned measures would lead to a healthier and fit nation.
In conclusion, the changed lifestyle of the modern generation have resulted in increased obesity rates among the population, while humans were active and, as a result, more fit in the past. Thus, the key to solving the problem is the regulations of the food industry and the promotion of sport by governments.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
Nowadays, a large number of people are overweight and are not as fi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, if, second, so, thus, well, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1697.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00589970501 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81566164607 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607669616519 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.416456726 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.133333333 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.2 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190968418694 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.054629747433 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0573103710524 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119508774682 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0824683123628 0.056905535591 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.