Plagiarism in academics has become a pressing problem in many countries today.
What are the causes of this problem?
what are some possible solutions
In the modern world, due to the development of advanced technologies and availability of academic information, plagiarism has become a burning issue in many countries. However, there are solutions for them.
First and foremost, the main cause of this problem is the progression of digital technologies. Nowadays, many students have an opportunity to share, to copy and save the information on the flesh cards as well as on the internet. In this reason, although many professors and teachers are complaining about this issue, the majority of students are keen to steal the information from the Wikipedia, instead of researching the work by themselves. To illustrate, Wikipedia has become one of the most popular website on the net, because of students’ visits. Secondly, accessibility of academic works made the situation worse. In this regard, there is an opinion that a special system is needed in order to regulate copyrights. For example, if the researches and works of individuals are protected by special system or law, learners will do their best in order to create their articles and scientific works.
However, there are many possible solutions for this problem. First of all, the authorities of academic institutions should prohibit the use of mobile phones and electrical gadgets during the lectures and practical lessons in order to decrease the number of plagiarism. Furthermore, it can lead to the improvement of performances of learners. For example, many private schools claimed that their students’ marks improved, when they prohibit the use of electrical gadgets. Secondly, copyrights should be protected. In this regard, universities should penalize the learners, who steals the materials of other individuals. A good illustration of this is deduction, because many students are concerned about their studies.
In conclusion, although many people tend to think that plagiarism cannot be defeated, others feel that protecting copyright and prohibition of mobiles phones can be viable options
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 901, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...te their articles and scientific works. However, there are many possible solutio...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, for example, in conclusion, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1705.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48231511254 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07532695506 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56270096463 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.7374110147 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.294117647 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2941176471 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64705882353 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204469191085 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0686647215484 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0847394636173 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117295227596 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0398930094371 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.