Some people believe that the responsibility of saving the environment should lie with politicians instead of individuals because individuals can do very little to save the environment. I would argue that a major responsibility for saving the environment should lie with politicians, but that small steps taken by individuals can also help save the environment.
To begin with, there are many things that people can do to protect the environment. Firstly, they should not use things that are hazardous for the environment. To explain it further, plastic waste is extremely harmful to our ecosystem, so it would be better to use eco-friendly products. Secondly, instead of changing items, people should recycle and reuse them. Consequently, they can save the environment by reducing waste. In other words, this small practise of individuals plays an important role in saving the environment. For example, Japanese natives use paper bags instead of plastic bags to save the environment, and hence they could mitigate the problem of plastic waste in their nation.
Moreover, the best way to protect the environment is by planting trees, because there are a multitude of benefits to growing trees. First of all, trees absorb carbon dioxide and give individuals oxygen; in addition to this, they also give fruits, flowers, and leaves, all of which are necessary in human lives. Furthermore, if farmers use organic fertiliser instead of synthetic fertilizer, they not only save land from harmful chemicals but also get organic goods. To exemplify, in Dublin, 60% of farmers use organic fertiliser, and hence they not only save the environment but also grow more goods.
Nevertheless, politicians have the potential to take important steps to prevent the environment. If they impose a ban on un-eco-friendly products, this approach might be useful to save the environment. Additionally, they can also run campaigns about spreading awareness about the factors that affect the environment, and as a result, many individuals stay aware of factors that affect the environment very badly. To add further, they can implement waste management systems that could be more effective than other methods to save the environment.
To sum up, although politicians have the power to save the environment, humans'Small steps can be more helpful to save the environment.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, for example, in addition, as a result, first of all, in other words, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1979.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 370.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34864864865 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03645852114 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486486486486 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 621.9 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.792439803 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.944444444 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5555555556 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3333333333 7.06120827912 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153814738469 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0562576073671 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0492335242883 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0970718139873 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0483882214539 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.