Politicians are responsible for protection of the environment than individuals. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
Politicians are definitely made for the people. This essay confines my opinion on politicians to create firewall for the environment and the contradicting option of people bringing safety that they wish to see in near future in their environment.
Firstly, politicians make law and provide the safety for the people when the environment is damaged by natural disasters. In addition, rules are made by government person keeping in mind of the issues faced by the poor people to eradicate theft, burglary, and chain pulling in society. Similarly, ownership lies in their hand as they are aware of the place they are elected as well as to make changes to environment by enabling electricity, hospitals and schools for people as promised.
Secondly, members of environment also have social responsibility to view positive changes that they expect from the society. Moreover, businessman, can use more staff to solve unemployment issue of their area. Further, women can form self-help groups by inviting underprivileged women to occupy in aari embroidery, candlemaking, tailoring, bamboo bag making. For instance, women in a state built low-cost restroom for needy people.
Finally, men or women can approach the local ministry or collectorate for funding to expand their social activity.
In conclusion, both government authorities and citizens are responsible for safety of their nation. Everyone should save water and tree to protect environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e in near future in their environment. Firstly, politicians make law and provid...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and schools for people as promised. Secondly, members of environment also ha...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lt low-cost restroom for needy people. Finally, men or women can approach the l...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nding to expand their social activity. In conclusion, both government authoriti...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, moreover, second, secondly, similarly, so, well, as to, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1229.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 224.0 315.596192385 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48660714286 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04211182501 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.611607142857 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 393.3 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.520542614 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.416666667 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5833333333 7.06120827912 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168233568689 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0665273816191 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0477027191396 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0938959507302 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0355004148133 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.