It is believed by many people that nowadays, the population of youngsters living in some countries is comparitively higher than the elderly people residing there. Although, the large number of youth signifies the growth and economic development of that country, with the hike in working professionals, the employment opportunities need to be increased. I strongly believe that if we are able to overcome these affects, the increase in the number of youth would be beneficial.
One evident benifit of having more number of young population is to enhance the country's workforce as well the defence. Moreover, the youngsters are more effective in performing a task using new techniques than old people. To illustrate, the 'One Child' policy in China has resulted in the decline of the number of youth, as a result, their military sector has degraded as compared to India, who's millitary professionals are increasing daily.
On the other hand, this rise in young population has also resulted in high unemployment rate. Consequently, the unemployed people tend to involve in various criminal activities that can have a serious impact on our society. Further, the elderly people with their experience and profound knowledge can guide the youth towards right direction and instill them with morals. However, with the intervention of government, various job opportunities can be created to satisfy the youngsters.
To conclude, by providing various job opportunities and inculcating the young population, we are able to mitigate the affects related to their rise. Therefore, this will result in enhancing the economy of the country and its development.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 391, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: who's
...ctor has degraded as compared to India, whos millitary professionals are increasing ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, however, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, well, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1396.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41085271318 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04945909453 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.593023255814 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2610908172 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.333333333 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.41666666667 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219006558811 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.073273583416 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.043900668641 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12100663931 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0310486914079 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.