Q) Some people think that because children find subjects such as mathematics and philosophy difficult, they ought to be optional instead of compulsory.
To what extent do you agree?
Certain people are of the view that difficult subjects such as mathematics and philosophy should not be made mandatory, rather students can opt them if they want. In my opinion, the compulsion of studying these subjects can have adverse effects on students, and therefore, should be restricted to studying the basic level.
One point to consider is that each student has different intellectual capability, so studying tough subjects should not be made obligatory on everyone. As students vary in their grasping power, all might not be able to master it and get good grades in the exams. As a result, students not only get disheartened but also lose interest in that subject.
Another point to consider is that making hard subjects optional would result in less stress and tension on the minds of students. At present, innumerable students are experiencing anxiety and depression problems due to the pressure to perform and excel in subjects such as mathematics and philosophy. Making them optional would definitely improve the psychological health of students.
However, basic understanding of mathematics and philosophy is required in different situations in life, hence they can be included in the curriculum. Moreover, this will enable students to explore the subject and obtain superficial knowledge of that subject.
In conclusion, although providing basic knowledge of mathematics and philosophy proved to be beneficial for students , it need not be made obligatory as it poses a serious threat to the student’s mental health and demoralises them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Certain people are of the view that diff...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...stricted to studying the basic level. One point to consider is that each stude...
^^^
Line 5, column 194, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s students vary in their grasping power, all might not be able to master it and g...
^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t also lose interest in that subject. Another point to consider is that making...
^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the psychological health of students. However, basic understanding of mathemat...
^^^
Line 9, column 177, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e curriculum. Moreover, this will enable students to explore the subject and obta...
^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uperficial knowledge of that subject. In conclusion, although providing basic ...
^^^
Line 11, column 117, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...phy proved to be beneficial for students , it need not be made obligatory as it po...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 8.3376753507 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1327.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 244.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43852459016 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00920702962 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565573770492 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 402.3 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0943280959 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.636363636 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1818181818 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.63636363636 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19924403105 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.080530864971 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.05866498282 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116734766545 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0434167896127 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.