Tobacco was once popularized by celebrities and advertisements many years ago. It was consumed by many adults back then; unfortunately, smoking has gain more traction in teenagers in the recent decade. As time passed, research discovered that smoking is unhealthy and is a major cause of many serious diseases. Some people believe that all tobacco related advertisements should be banned. I completely agree with that idea.
Teenagers can be easily draw into smoking. They are less health-conscious than adults because they are mostly healthy and their body are still developing; therefore, they might not be aware of negative effects of nicotine because diseases takes several years to develop into serious symptoms. Furthermore, they are at the age that want more social acceptance, and following the trend or advertisements makes them belong to the group.
Smoking itself does no good to the smokers themselves or surrounding people. It is a major cause of several severe diseases such as lung cancer, respiratory disorder, or cardiovascular. Not only the smokers that are vulnerable to those diseases, secondhand smokers such as family or friends who breathe the smoke as smokers are also vulnerable. More than that, secondhand smoking is more severely harmful because the smoke is not filtered. Recent research also found that thirdhand smokers who indirectly contact nicotine that covers furnitures or garments are also vulnerable; because of that, home is no longer safe for a small baby to crawl around.
In summary, teenagers should be protected from smoking advertisements because they can be easily influenced and they might not be aware of its negative effect. Smoking itself does no good to the smokers or their society. I completely agree that smoking related advertisements must be banned in all kinds of media including but not limited to TV commercials and the Internet banners.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, second, so, still, then, therefore, third, in summary, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1607.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35666666667 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9564449372 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.54 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.7978359781 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.4375 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0610893638389 0.244688304435 25% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0216816339023 0.084324248473 26% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0354989543677 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.040580020702 0.151304729494 27% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.03569642006 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.